VLAS Trigger Leakage

Arxiv pdf 2025-12-11T00:00:00
arXiv Paper — PDF not available. Only the Executive Summary is available here. To read or download the full paper, visit the arXiv abstract page.

Abstract

Vision-Language Agentic Systems (VLAS) connect visual perception to planning, tool use, and physical actions. This means backdoor-type triggers can propagate through both decision pipelines and their connected interfaces, thus making visual backdoors a system-level threat. Current evaluations on such backdoors focus on clean accuracy and attack success rate (ASR), metrics that capture whether a trigger works, but not whether an attack is actually precise i.e. whether it triggers hidden behaviors only when intended. In this work, we formalize the failure of trigger precision as trigger leakage: inputs that are visually or semantically close to the intended trigger and therefore inadvertently activate the attacker-specified behavior. To quantify this leakage, we introduce Neighbor Leakage Rate (NLR). Our experiments show that at a 3% poisoning ratio, icon and text triggers remain robust to common visual transformations, but their neighboring variants leak heavily, with NLR reaching 0 _._ 996 (icon) and 0 _._ 944 (text). Using textual triggers as a controlled probe, we show that standard fine-tuning learns a broad activation region rather than an exact trigger condition, causing neighboring strings to invoke the malicious behavior even when the exact trigger is absent. Adding edit-distance-one hard-negative samples during training substantially narrows this activation region and reduces leakage, including in image-editing and embodied-manipulation workflows, where leaked triggers can propagate into executable programs and action sequences.

Loading executive summary...

LINK COPIED TO CLIPBOARD