Securing Physical LLM Agents

Arxiv pdf 2026-08-01T00:00:00
arXiv Paper — PDF not available. Only the Executive Summary is available here. To read or download the full paper, visit the arXiv abstract page.

Abstract

Self-evolving Skill harnesses (AutoSkills, Hermes Agent) generate more advisory orchestration automatically; their reported gains are efficiency, not safety. This misses the actual gap: a Skill describes how an agent should behave; a Policy decides which behavior is allowed to become an action. Todays format covers the first with markdown and scripts; the second is left to the model. Generating more Skills scales the gap, not the safety, especially when a wrong invocation can unlock a door or move money. Two adjacent attacks are documented: malicious skills compromising cloud software, and jailbroken LLM-controlled robots causing physical harm. Their intersection, malicious agent skills causing physical harm, follows directly but has not been reported. We name this class _Borrowed Authority_ : Skills format gives the receiving agent no typed way to reject an inter-agent permission claim, so a malicious or misused Skill can drive actuation by attaching one. We propose Edge Skillguard, a typed authority layer that lives inside the Skill artifact rather than between tools as workflow engines do, with guards over world state and sensor evidence. On a live edge controlplane testbed, the guards reject 60/60 borrowed-authority requests across five attack variants without blocking benign requests, and the result holds at 5 scale and across hosts over a Tailscale mesh. These results suggest that highrisk Skills should co-package typed invocation policy with procedural knowledge, so that physical actions depend on machine-checkable evidence rather than peer-agent claims.

Loading executive summary...

LINK COPIED TO CLIPBOARD