Multi-Agent V2X Defense
Abstract
A connected vehicle has roughly 100 milliseconds to decide whether an incoming Basic Safety Message is real or fabricated. If a false emergency braking alert reaches the planning pipeline in time, the car brakes. That is a safety failure triggered by a security failure, and existing intrusion detection systems are not designed to handle that coupling. They operate per vehicle, per message, with static rules - blind to attack patterns that only emerge across a fleet or over time, and blind to the fundamental tension between dropping a suspicious message and dropping a real emergency alert. We propose a three-tier multi-agent architecture that treats this timing constraint as a hard design requirement, not a performance target. At the vehicle level, an onboard agent classifies each incoming V2X message into one of four actions - Accept, Drop, Quarantine, or Escalate - within a 10millisecond budget. The classifier is deliberately biased toward Escalate when uncertain, passing ambiguous cases to the roadside edge agent rather than risking a dropped legitimate alert. The edge agent operates across a roadside unit zone with a 50-millisecond budget, fusing threat assessments from multiple vehicles and resolving safety-security conflicts using complementary sensor observations. The cloud tier refines detection models through Byzantine fault-tolerant federated learning and redistributes updated weights to the fleet. Every timing constraint derives directly from the 100-millisecond Basic Safety Message cycles mandated by SAE J2735 and ETSI EN 302 637-2. This paper does not present simulation results or empirical validation - the contribution is architectural. We argue that no existing framework simultaneously assigns standards-grounded latency budgets to all three deployment tiers while treating safety-security conflict resolution as a firstclass design constraint. Remaining open problems - adversarial model poisoning at the edge and the absence of regulatory frameworks for autonomous security response - are discussed as concrete directions for future work.